Electronic Team uses cookies to personalize your experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our cookie policy. Click here to learn more.

VirtualBox vs VMware: Which is Better for Your Environment

Editorial Team Editorial Team Jan 14, 2025

Regarding virtualization, two giants dominate the market: VirtualBox and VMware. Both tools offer robust solutions for running multiple operating systems on a single machine, but deciding between them can be challenging. This article compares VMware Workstation vs VirtualBox and evaluates the options to determine whether VMware or VirtualBox is better suited for your needs.

Quick Overview

VirtualBox, developed by Oracle, is a free and open-source virtualization tool. It is widely used for testing, development, and learning purposes due to its extensive platform support and affordability. VMware, on the other hand, offers a range of virtualization products, including VMware Player, VMware Workstation, and VMware Fusion, catering to both individual users and enterprises.

When choosing between "VMware Fusion vs VirtualBox," "VMware Workstation vs VirtualBox," or "VMware Player vs VirtualBox," the decision ultimately depends on your requirements:

  • Choose VirtualBox if you need a free, open-source solution with broad platform compatibility and straightforward functionality.
  • Choose VMware if performance, advanced features, and enterprise-level tools are priorities.

Both VirtualBox and VMware have their strengths and cater to different audiences.

Feature VirtualBox VMware
Cost Free and open-source Free for Player; Workstation ($149+), Fusion ($79.99+)
Platform Support Windows, macOS, Linux, Solaris Windows, Linux, macOS (Fusion only)
Ease of Use Beginner-friendly Polished with professional-grade tools
Performance Good for small to mid-size workloads Superior for graphics and enterprise tasks
Disk Formats VDI, VMDK, VHD VMDK primarily
Unique Features Open-source, seamless mode Sphere integration, macOS Metal API

The next parts dive into the VMware vs Oracle VirtualBox debate to explore their differences and use cases.

VBox vs VMware: General Differences

VirtualBox vs VMware

Both VirtualBox and VMware are hypervisors. Hypervisor is specialized software that can be used to simultaneously run multiple virtual machines on a physical server. It’s an excellent way to maximize the value of hardware devices by allowing resources to be shared among many users.

Hypervisors come in two flavors:

  • Type 1 (native) hypervisors access hardware directly and don't require the support of an underlying OS. They act as the operating system and control calls for resources.
  • Type 2 hypervisors run on top of a traditional OS as an application. They provide virtualization capabilities by coordinating calls for resources through the host operating system.

Here’s how the two virtualization solutions are categorized:

  • VMware ESXi is a type 1 hypervisor that needs to be installed on bare metal.
  • VMware Player, Workstation, and Fusion are type 2 hypervisors that need to be installed on a physical device with a host operating system.
  • VirtualBox is also a type 2 hypervisor that needs to be installed on a host OS.

In general, type 1 hypervisors are better for large production environments while type 2 hypervisors are more suited to users who wish to run a virtual machine on their personal computers.


Cost Comparison: Which Option Fits Your Budget?

VirtualBox: Free and open-source. It offers a comprehensive set of features at no cost, making it accessible for personal and commercial use.

VMware: VMware Player is free for personal use, but VMware Workstation and Fusion require a paid license. Pricing for VMware Workstation starts at approximately $149 for a standard license, while VMware Fusion for macOS is priced starting at $79.99 for personal use. Both offer advanced features and robust performance that justify their costs for professional and enterprise environments.


Features Breakdown: What Each Tool Offers

VirtualBox:

  • Supports a wide range of host and guest operating systems.
  • Offers snapshot functionality to save and revert to system states.
  • Includes seamless mode for integration between host and guest systems.
  • Provides an open-source extension pack for additional features.

VMware:

  • Advanced 3D graphics support.
  • Robust snapshot and cloning features.
  • VMware Fusion supports macOS, making it ideal for Apple users.
  • Professional-grade tools for enterprise environments, including vSphere integration for centralized management, enhanced networking with virtual switches, and tools for automated testing and deployment. These features are particularly useful for IT professionals managing complex systems or developing virtualized applications.

Supported USB Devices

Many users want the ability to access USB devices from within a virtual session. USB passthrough functionality increases the value of a peripheral physical device attached to the host computer. With the USB passthrough, a USB hub can be connected to easily allow virtual machines to gain access to a variety of connected peripherals.

Both platforms support connecting USB devices to virtual machines using native VM options. In some cases, the introduction of a third-party tool to act as a USB controller or USB arbitrator can streamline efforts to connect and use USB devices. VBox users need to use the Extension Pack to enable USB 2.0 and 3.0 support.
VMware supports USB devices out of the box.

Related Articles

Performance Insights: How They Stack Up

VirtualBox:

  • May have slightly lower performance in graphics-intensive applications.
  • Works efficiently for small to mid-sized workloads.

VMware:

  • Superior performance for resource-heavy tasks and large-scale enterprise applications.
  • Better optimization for 3D graphics and gaming.

Platform Compatibility

VirtualBox: Available on Windows, macOS, Linux, and Solaris. Its cross-platform compatibility makes it highly versatile.

VMware:

- VMware Player and Workstation: Available on Windows and Linux. Benchmarks indicate that VMware Workstation outperforms VirtualBox in tasks requiring intensive graphics and resource utilization. For example, tests show VMware achieves faster boot times and better handling of 3D rendering in virtualized environments, making it ideal for developers and IT professionals managing complex workflows.
- VMware Fusion: Exclusive to macOS.


User Experience: Which Is Easier to Operate?

VirtualBox: Straightforward setup and user-friendly interface. Ideal for beginners and developers who require quick and flexible environments.

VMware: Offers a polished user experience with professional-grade features. While slightly more complex, it provides unique advantages such as macOS-exclusive features in VMware Fusion, including support for Metal graphics API and optimized performance for macOS-specific applications, enhancing the experience for Apple users.


Disk Format Support: Compatibility and Options

VirtualBox: Supports VDI (Virtual Disk Image), VMDK (Virtual Machine Disk), and VHD (Virtual Hard Disk).

VMware: Primarily uses VMDK, which is widely compatible and robust for virtual environments.

FAQ

Both VirtualBox and VMware are available for macOS, but VMware Fusion is specifically designed for macOS and provides native support for macOS features like Metal graphics API. VirtualBox, while functional, may not offer the same level of optimization and performance on macOS.
Some disadvantages of VirtualBox include slightly lower performance compared to VMware in graphics-intensive applications, less polished enterprise features, and occasional compatibility issues with certain guest operating systems.
Yes, VirtualBox and VMware can coexist on the same system, but issues might arise if both programs attempt to access the same hardware virtualization features simultaneously. It is recommended to use one at a time.
Yes, VMware is generally better for enterprise use due to its advanced features like vSphere integration, robust networking options, and better performance for resource-heavy applications.
VirtualBox is a better option for students due to its free and open-source nature. It provides ample features for learning and experimenting without the need for a paid license.
logo USB Network Gate
#1 at Networking
USB Network Gate
Share USB over Ethernet on Windows
4.7 rank based on 372 + users
Try for Free
Purchase Now
Information
Requirements: OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/8.1/10/11; Windows Server 2008 R2/2012/2012 R2/2016/2019/2022
Architectures: x86, x64, ARM64, 9.31MB free space
Latest version: v11.0.2687, Released 27 Jan, 2025 Release notes
Category: Networking
Demo Limitations: 14-day trial, You can share only 1 local USB-device
Pricing: Starts from $159.95
Languages: English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, 日本の, 한국어, Polski, Português, Русский, Español, Tiếng Việt, Nederlands, 中文
Also Available: USB Network Gate is a cross-platform solution compatible with Mac, Linux and Android OSes:
UNG for Mac
UNG for Linux
UNG for Android